Security at the Edge Needs More Attention
For technology leaders, the real issue is not whether edge security tools exist, but who owns the risk where work actually happens. Shadow IT, self-service cloud, helpdesk resets and local workarounds all sit at the boundary between security and operations. If those decisions are left implicit, the organisation ends up with inconsistent controls, uneven accountability and weak visibility into where policy is being bypassed.
This makes governance more important than another point solution. CISOs and IT leaders should clarify decision rights for provisioning, identity recovery, SaaS approval and exception handling. The practical question is not only โis this secure?โ but โwho can approve it, who can override it, and how will we know when business convenience is increasing exposure?โ Without that operating model, teams can technically deploy zero trust while still leaving high-risk manual paths open.
There is also a portfolio trade-off. Investment in detection, training, asset discovery and identity controls should be judged together, not as separate local optimisations. Leaders need a clear view of which measures reduce repeat incidents, which reduce blast radius, and which simply add friction. Useful next questions include: which workflows generate the most avoidable risk, which business units create the most unmanaged assets, and where is the organisation tolerating insecure convenience because the cost of change has not been made visible?
The management challenge is to turn security from a specialist function into an enterprise control system. That means measuring exceptions, tracking recovery events, mapping unmanaged tools, and linking those signals to business ownership. If leaders cannot see the edge, they cannot govern it.
Know What You Have
Itโs important for CISOs to have knowledge of and visibility into every asset in their companyโs tech stack, though some CISOs see room for improvement. โYou spend a lot of time and money on people, processes and technology to develop a layered security approach and defense in depth, and that doesn’t work if you don’t know you have something to defend there,โ says Fowler. โI continually hear it at conferences, โWe struggle as security practitioners with having an accurate inventory of our environments.โ And it’s not a malicious activity.โ The problem is one of distraction: The business is operating at light speed and going in so many different directions that holes in the perimeter or environment may be overlooked. โ[W]e spend a lot of money as an industry on platforms that will scan your entire environment and it will tell you everything that’s there, making sure you don’t miss a thing. Rest easy,โ says Fowler. โWell, that’s great, but there’s a whole business group that I didn’t even know existed to tell you to scan or to put an agent on. It’s frustrating at times, and I think one of the ways you can help buttress it, [is having] good technology in place [and] good business relationships.โZero Trust Isnโt a Silver Bullet
Zero trust is vital, but its efficacy varies greatly. Some vendors position products as zero trust when theyโre really a firewall or VPN. Worse, not everyone has the same definition of โzero trust.โ โ[W]hen you look at breach reports, and if you go back and look at incidents again, you have a lot of companies that have checked all the boxes, and they’re living in a zero-trust network, but they really didn’t implement all the capabilities of what we think about as zero trust, and therefore there were gaps,โ says Security Scorecardโs Cobb. Account recovery is a challenge because end users want convenience, and convenience is often at odds with security. Aaron Painter, CEO at identity verification company Nametag, says helpdesk and customer service departments are problematic because companies overlook the multifactor authentication (MFA) backdoor resets and trust existing tools and processes too much. โCISOs put their trust in security questions, customer service supervisor oversight, and using Zoom calls for visual verification to prevent helpdesk social engineering attacks. This is a gaping security hole that continues to be exploited by bad actors daily,โ says Painter in an email interview. โOur CISOs are getting pressure from the CEO, the board, the FBI, the Department of Health all offering much needed, but often short-sighted guidance to defend against these sophisticated cyberattacks. Nothing is foolproof. As long as we keep believing in the myth that MFA is 100% secure, we leave our companies, and our bank accounts, wide open for bad actors to exploit during the account reset process.โ CISOs should implement advanced technologies that incorporate AI, mobile cryptography, machine learning, and advanced biometric recognition because they will serve as crucial support tools for IT helpdesks and customer services agents, enhancing their ability to safeguard against fraud and prevent impersonators from being authenticated in the first place.Bottom Line
Interdepartmental communication and the plethora of tools available help organizations protect themselves from cyberattacks, but nothing is 100% effective, people are easy to deceive, and bad actors are becoming more sophisticated. โMany breaches come down to the fact that a userโs credentials were compromised. The attacker didnโt have to hack anything, they just logged in because they had the credentials,โ says SecurityScorecardโs Cobb. โYou can be sure you have some user that chooses the same password for Netflix as they do for the corporate VPN.โEnjoyed this article? Sign up for our newsletter to receive regular insights and stay connected.
