The agentic shift at the Snowflake Summit: Finding a platform’s ‘right to win’
For CIOs, the strategic issue is not whether โagenticโ features will spread, but which platform deserves a place in the enterprise stack. The Snowflake and Anthropic messages point to a market in which vendors are converging on similar AI claims, making differentiation harder to assess. That raises a management question: are you buying a durable capability, or funding a vendorโs attempt to expand into adjacent categories?
The practical implication is that platform selection now needs a stricter test of right to win. Leaders should separate capabilities that reduce operational friction โ such as trusted data handling, governance, and self-service discovery โ from broader agent-building ambitions that may be harder to operationalise and govern. The trade-off is clear: a narrower platform may deliver faster adoption and lower risk, while a broader one could promise more integration but increase lock-in, complexity, and roadmap dependency.
Decision rights matter here. If AI agents are expected to touch data quality, cataloguing, access control, and business inquiry, then ownership cannot sit only with the data team or only with application leaders. CIOs should clarify who approves use cases, who validates model outputs, who is accountable for data trust, and how changes to the stack will be funded and measured. Without that governance, โinnovationโ becomes a distributed control risk.
The next questions for the executive team are straightforward: which enterprise problems are genuinely strategic enough to justify platform commitment, which can be solved with lighter-weight tools, and what evidence will prove value within 6โ12 months? In a fast-moving market, the safest choice is not the most ambitious vendor story, but the one that aligns strongest with business value, operating discipline, and exit options if the category shifts again.
-
Providing an agentic AI layer designed for data consumers.
-
Offering alternatives to legacy partners in the areas of data cataloging, data governance, and trust.
Snowflake’s (too) broad agenda
The competitive Catch-22 is that Snowflake’s strategy โ as alluded to by Ramaswamy โ is now the industry standard, with virtually very cloud vendor pursuing this identical path forward. This means that CIOs face a difficult challenge in choosing how to architect their AI data stack. Is Snowflake the solution of choice? What I ended up thinking was that Snowflake has taken on too broad a message and is not effectively telling CIOs that it is using its stack to solve two incredibly difficult problems:-
Actively building agents aimed at solving the foundational data problems that the vast majority of businesses struggle with. These agents will autonomously fix data quality issues, fix data governance, and more.
-
Creating agents for users who want to consume data and ask questions about data. This includes the ability to suggest additional follow-up questions.
Balancing AI speed with safety
On stage, Amodei was beaming in the afterglow of filing paperwork earlier in the day for her company to go public with an astronomical valuation approaching one trillion dollars. While the precise numbers will be determined later by market makers, Anthropic’s staggering $965 billion valuation places it in the top tier of tech giants alongside Alphabet, Microsoft, and Apple. In an effort to effectively justify the company’s value, she noted that “AI is now a foundational part of every corporate strategy.” In sharing Anthropic’s progress, she said that while models have gotten so much better recently, the industry still doesn’t know where this trajectory is ultimately going. And, of deep concern to CIOs, Amodei implied that things are changing so fast with foundational models that solutions can become obsolete in a matter of months. Given this velocity, she agreed it was a meaningful question for companies to ask how they can plan and build around what they have today when the underlying technology is changing so fast. She argued it is critical to balance speed with safety โ a clear allusion to her former employer, Open AI. According to Amodei, trust is an accelerant. If CIOs do the safety work, their organizations can actually move faster. “This is a very challenging time and we are not getting a lot sleep,” she admitted, noting that the explosive market growth and heightened market expectations are forcing the company to keep up an unrelenting pace. With their headcount now at 3,500 people, she added, “We are not a small startup anymore.” Given this, I believe market and investor expectations are going to eventually drive Anthropic to move further up the enterprise software stack and challenge the rest of the marketplace. Like competing vendors, they already have agent-building technology along with prebuilt agents by function and industry, and a growing list of prebuilt connectors. While they have not bought into the data space yet, their current moves are driving the intense market pressure that everyone in the software industry is feeling.Core capabilities and the right to win
There are many questions that CIOs will want answered. How far will Anthropic go to claim its market position? Armed with such a large valuation, will they use their capital to acquire adjacent companies and assemble a complete enterprise offering? Clearly, data ecosystem mainstays like Snowflake could eventually be in play. But as a VC once told to me, companies must “stay focused on one thing โ adding business value”. To ensure that they create unique business value, platforms should focus on the capabilities that from their fundamental right to win โ the four or five strengths that differentiate them in a crowded market. For Snowflake, part of doing so involves clearing up its story so it centers clearly on delivering a reliable data stack and truly modern self-service BI. Meanwhile, the question for Anthropic is whether, as a public entity, it will choose to acquire external pieces of software, such as deterministic model software or a low-code business process platform. Regardless of their path, these moves will impact every company in the software space. While only time will tell how, focused data companies remain the safest bets in the coming transition.Enjoyed this article? Sign up for our newsletter to receive regular insights and stay connected.
