U.S. Inflation Relief And Consumer Cooldown Boosts Chances Of Rate Cuts
For ETF investors, the key issue is not the inflation print itself but the path it sets for interest-rate expectations. When markets begin to price in easier policy, the biggest transmission mechanism is usually duration: longer-maturity government bond ETFs tend to react more sharply to changes in discount-rate assumptions than short-duration funds or cash-like instruments. That makes the current backdrop especially relevant for investors deciding whether they want more rate sensitivity now, or a more defensive income posture.
It is also a reminder that bond allocation is about balancing two different risks. If inflation is easing while growth cools, high-quality fixed income can become more attractive as a portfolio stabiliser. But that does not mean all bond ETFs behave the same way. Treasury-heavy funds, intermediate-term portfolios and inflation-linked strategies each respond differently to falling policy expectations, changes in real yields and shifting recession probabilities.
For long-term portfolios, the practical question is allocation discipline. Investors often wait for a clear policy pivot before adjusting exposure, but ETF structure makes gradual rebalancing easier. A staged approach can help avoid concentrating timing risk in a single rate move. Useful checks include:
- how much duration risk is already embedded in the portfolio;
- whether bond exposure is intended for income, capital preservation or equity ballast;
- whether the chosen ETF matches the role it is meant to play.
In other words, softer inflation and slower spending may matter less as a trading signal than as a cue to review whether fixed income holdings are aligned with the portfolioโs true risk budget.
Inflation relief with a “low” 0.1%
The May personal income and spending report has offered some encouragement that inflation pressures are easing once again, after coming in far too hot in the first three months of the year. The core personal consumer expenditure deflator, a broader measure of inflation pressures than CPI that the Fed prefers to focus on, came in at 0.1%MoM/2.6%YoY. This was expected given the read-through from components within the CPI and PPI reports, but after plenty of upside surprises this year, it is a relief. The headline measure (including food & energy) was 0.0%MoM/2.6%YoY, as expected. Looking at the unrounded numbers, the month-on-month change in core inflation was actually a โlowโ 0.1%, coming in at 0.083% to 3 decimal places, although April was revised up marginally to 0.259% from 0.249%, thereby making it a 0.3% MoM rounded, which is a tiny bit disappointing. Overall though, it helps the argument that inflation is looking better behaved, which may well open the door to interest rate cuts later in the year.Core PCE deflator
Source: Macrobond, ING
Consumer cooldown continues
Household income was stronger than predicted, rising 0.5% MoM in nominal terms, with real household disposable income also up 0.5%. Spending also recovered, rising 0.3% MoM in real terms, after Aprilโs 0.1% drop and downward revisions to first quarter numbers. Nonetheless, the trend does appear to be slowing. Consumer spending averaged 3.2% real annualised growth in the second half of 2023, but assuming we get a 0.2% real MoM increase in spending in June, that will mean annualised consumer spending growth of just 1.5% in the first half 2024. As such, both inflation and spending suggest tight monetary policy is cooling the economy and constraining price increases.The Fed doesnโt want to cause an unnecessary downturn โ rate cuts from September
The Fed believes monetary policy is restrictive at 5.25-5.50% in an environment where it views the neutral interest rate as being around 2.8%. The Fed doesnโt want to cause a recession if it doesnโt have to and if the data allows it to start making monetary policy slightly less restrictive, we think the Fed will take that opportunity, potentially as soon as September. For officials to be comfortable taking that course of action, we think the Fed needs to see three things:- More evidence of inflation pressures easing. If we can get another couple of 0.2% or below MoM core inflation prints in quick succession, that will be a necessary, but not a sufficient factor that leads to a rate cut.
- More evidence of labour market slack. The unemployment rate has gone from 3.4% to 4.0%. If that moves convincingly above 4% with more evidence of a cooling of wages, this too will help swing the argument in favour of rate cuts โ jobless claims data and weak business hiring surveys suggest the jobs market is softening.
- Softening consumer spending. It has been the primary growth engine in the US, but as stated, the rate of growth has halved between the second half of 2023 and first half of 2024. The Fed needs to see that continue through into the third quarter. Weak real household disposable income growth, the exhaustion of pandemic-era accrued savings for millions of households and rising loan delinquencies suggest financial stress is materialising for many lower-income families, suggesting this will indeed continue.
Enjoyed this article? Sign up for our newsletter to receive regular insights and stay connected.