XLC: Meta And Google Domination Has Helped
XLC’s appeal starts with its construction. Communication services is a broad-sounding label, but the ETF is built from a sector index that can pull together very different businesses, from platforms and media to telecom infrastructure. That matters because the fund is not a pure “future of communications” theme; it is a rules-based sector sleeve with a specific set of inclusion criteria and a relatively tight stock count.
For ETF investors, concentration is the key design issue. When a few mega-cap names carry a large share of the portfolio, the fund’s behavior can become less about the sector as a whole and more about the earnings, valuation and sentiment of those leaders. That can be useful if you want targeted exposure, but it also means the ETF can move in ways that differ sharply from broader US equity benchmarks.
The portfolio role is just as important as the holdings list. A sector ETF like XLC can complement a diversified core, yet it should be sized with an eye on overlap, style drift and rebalancing discipline. Communication services can also be sensitive to regulation, advertising demand and consumer spending, so investors should treat it as a cyclical equity allocation rather than a defensive anchor.
A Look At The Holdings
Because this is such a focused fund by sector, it should come as no surprise that it’s top-heavy.
ssga.com
The takeaway is simple here. Meta Platforms, Inc. (META), Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) (GOOGL), AT&T Inc. (T), T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS), Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ), and Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR) are essentially out connected world. And they are companies that we can’t really live without anymore now, can we?
Sector Allocation
Within the sector, there’s a decent amount of diversification from an industry subgroup perspective.
ssga.com
The media focus is interesting in the 2nd and 3rd spots. This fund does have one can argue discretionary names in the holdings (Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) comes to mind) but the point is that it involves several content providers that the communications companies basically pushed out.
Peer Comparison
One fund worth comparing against is the Vanguard Communication Services Index Fund ETF Shares (VOX). Both XLC and VOX are passive ETFs that focus on the communication services sector, but they have differing tenures as to how long they’ve been available and the indices they track. XLC, which began in 2018, tracks the S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index. VOX, which started in 2004, follows the MSCI US Investable Market Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index. When we look at the price ratio of XLC to VOX, we find that XLC has solidly outperformed, largely given the more concentrated positioning in the top 10 in a Mag 7 world. So long as Meta and Alphabet dominate, so too likely will XLC versus VOX.
StockCharts.com
Pros and Cons
On the positive side, XLC gives you a chance to invest in some top companies in communication services. These companies, like Meta, Alphabet, and Netflix, are leading the way in new tech. They’re at the forefront of things like AI and the metaverse. This means XLC could grow as these technologies become more important. XLC also includes some older telecom companies. These add some stability and might pay dividends. This mix of old and new allows XLC to do well in different market conditions. It can benefit from both value and growth investment styles. The downside? The fund’s focused nature means that weak performance from just a few top holdings can have a big effect on overall returns. Also, the communication services sector is known to be cyclical often doing well during economic booms but struggling during downturns. Regulatory risks are another thing to think about for the big tech companies that make up most of the fund. Ongoing checks on data privacy practices, worries about monopolies, and possible new rules could affect these companies’ growth paths.Conclusion
Investors who see promise in the long-term growth of digital communication and entertainment, and who don’t mind the fund’s focused strategy, might find XLC a useful addition to their diverse portfolio. I still worry about the high concentration at the top, but it’s clearly worked and can continue to do so. Overall a good fund, though one that, I think, can be better timed after a market correction that would likely hit tech hardest (whenever it does happen).Enjoyed this article? Sign up for our newsletter to receive regular insights and stay connected.
