Can Pursuing A PhD Impact Mental Health?

The main takeaway is not that a PhD “causes” poor mental health in every case, but that the training environment may add real strain on top of any pre-existing vulnerability. When a study compares future PhD students with similar master’s students and still sees higher later use of psychiatric medication, that strengthens the case for an association that is more than simple self-selection. Still, medication use is only one signal, and it does not capture the full picture of stress, burnout, sleep loss, anxiety, or informal coping.

Context matters. Doctoral study often combines long hours, uncertain career prospects, social comparison, and weak boundaries between work and rest. Those pressures may affect people differently depending on age, gender, prior mental health history, supervision quality, finances, and whether the field has a highly competitive culture. That means the risk is probably not uniform across all students or departments, even if the overall trend points in the same direction.

For readers, the practical implication is to treat PhD wellbeing as a systems issue, not just an individual resilience issue. Helpful supports are likely to include realistic workload expectations, access to timely counseling, stronger mentoring, and norms that make it acceptable to ask for help early. The evidence here does not prove that academic rigor is inherently harmful; rather, it suggests that some training conditions may amplify stress enough to affect mental health outcomes. That distinction matters for prevention and for how universities design graduate programs.


What happens when you put together a group of super achievers who are accustomed to being the best into a new environment called a PhD program? Scott Turow’s One L provides a window into that environment at Harvard Law School, one that mirrors many of the trials and tribulations that many graduate students face across multiple fields. U.S. survey data in prior published research indicates that about 14.9% of PhD students in economics and 10 to 13.5% of PhD students in Original Posts-political-science-and-politics/article/mental-health-and-the-phd-insights-and-implications-for-political-science/55487C73C145ED49D332B597E5E040B9" href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/mental-health-and-the-phd-insights-and-implications-for-political-science/55487C73C145ED49D332B597E5E040B9" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" shape="rect">political science have received mental health treatment. However, because it is not possible to randomly assign people to a PhD program and then follow them over time, it is also unclear whether these students who sought out mental health treatment already had issues to begin with prior to entering the programs. Now, a new working paper by Sanna Bergvall, Clara Fernstrom, Eva Ranehill, and Anna Sandberg at Lund University using Swedish population-wide and longitudinal administrative records tries to estimate whether this higher incidence of mental health uptake among PhD students is due to selection or perhaps due to doing a PhD itself. They do this by showing that prior to entering the PhD, prospective students have similar reported mental health issues as a matched sample of master’s degree students in the same field. However, by following both groups of students past the onset of the PhD program starting, the authors document that there is a significant increase in the use of psychiatric medication among the PhD students. This finding generally holds across fields, with variation, such as a notable exception for the medical and health sciences. Overall, groups that were most susceptible to obtaining psychiatric medication during their PhD were older people, women, and those with a previous history of using psychiatric medications. The authors of the new study note that in 2016, 13.5% of their sample of active PhD students received psychiatric medication. This is quite similar to the studies in economics and political science showing between 10 to 14.9% of PhD students received mental health treatment. Additionally, the authors of this new study argue that because they are recording diagnosed mental health problems, the percentage reporting may be an underestimate. The authors conclude: “If PhD studies negatively impact mental health, this likely decrease both academic productivity and causes a selection of researchers not only based on academic aptitude, but also mental resilience.”
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonathanwai/2024/09/19/can-pursuing-a-phd-impact-mental-health/

Enjoyed this article? Sign up for our newsletter to receive regular insights and stay connected.