Cleaning products that cause rashes

The key public-health point is not that one ingredient is uniquely โ€œtoxic,โ€ but that repeated low-dose exposure can matter once skin has been sensitized. For contact dermatitis, the relevant question is often not what is present in a product, but whether a personโ€™s immune system has already learned to react to it. That makes the same ingredient harmless for many users and highly relevant for a smaller subset.

The evidence also shows how product reformulation can change disease patterns. When a preservative becomes common across many categories โ€” wipes, soaps, detergents, cosmetics and cleaners โ€” it becomes much harder to identify and avoid. That doesnโ€™t prove every rash is caused by one compound, but it does explain why allergy rates can rise after a new ingredient spreads widely and fall when regulators restrict it. The history here is a reminder that exposure patterns can be as important as ingredient identity.

For readers, the practical challenge is label literacy, not panic. โ€œHypoallergenicโ€ or โ€œgentleโ€ claims do not guarantee absence of the culprit, and products used on skin are not the only source. For people with persistent or recurring rashes, patch testing can clarify whether avoidance is likely to help. For everyone else, the broader lesson is to treat skin reactions as potentially environmental and to consider household products alongside foods, plants or stress when trying to understand flare-ups.

One uncertainty remains important: a rash can have more than one driver. Existing eczema, irritation from detergents, and true allergy can overlap, so identifying a preservative does not automatically explain every symptom. That nuance is useful because it supports a more careful, less all-or-nothing approach to skin care and avoidance.


The rash from hell

My doctor at first thought the eczema-like rash that appearedย on my left arm was due to poison ivy.

But after initially responding to a steroid injection, the rash returned on my arm and also appeared on my leg and back of my neck.ย By August,ย it was popping up all over my body, and various steroids did little to help. Sometimes I scratched so hardย that itย bled.

Eventually, my doctors gave me something called a โ€œpatch testโ€ that involves taping dozens of allergen patchesย to myย back for 48 hours to see if you have aย reaction. Itโ€™s as unpleasant as it sounds. To my surprise, it revealed I had an allergy to two preservatives that Iย had never heard of: methylisothiazolinone andย methylchloroisothiazolinone.

As I soon found out, these and other closely related preservatives are everywhere. Theyโ€™re in shampoos, liquid dish detergents and soaps, laundry detergent, dishwasher rinse aid and cosmetics. Theyโ€™re also in household paint and cleaners. And theyโ€™ve caused aย worldwide epidemic of contact skin allergies in recent years, according to aย 2023 study in JAMA Dermatology.

โ€œIn the last 15 years, we have seen a significantย increase in the numberย of peopleย who have contact allergiesโ€ to the preservatives,ย says Margo Reeder, a dermatologist at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health,ย andย lead author on the study.ย โ€œWe need preservatives, but this class of preservatives is unfortunately causing a lot of contact allergies.โ€

How common these allergies are in the general population isnโ€™t known, as most people donโ€™tย have severe enough symptoms to get a patch test.ย But they are one of the most common findings from the tests. The JAMA Dermatology paper found 15% of people tested in the US and Canada in 2017 and 2018 had a contact allergy to methylisothiazolinone, or MI. A 2024ย analysis that lookedย at aย broader range of isothiazolinone preservativesย found thatย  22% of people tested in North Americaย had an allergy to one or more of them.

The epidemic began after manufacturers started putting MIย in various personal care products about 20 years ago, including babyย wipes. Researchers at the time assumed,ย based on aย flawedย interpretation of animal data, that itย would be less allergenic than theย methylchloroisothiazolinone combination product they previously favored. Contact allergies to the preservatives soon started becoming more common in Europe.ย Inย the US,ย doctors in 2014 reportedย strange rashes on the bottomsย and faces of young kids whoโ€™d been cleaned withย baby wipes.

The European Union cracked down on MIย starting in 2013,ย  eventuallyย banning it in leave-on products like wipes, and sharply restricting levels in rinse-off products like shampoo. Allergy rates there then declined.

But in the US, itโ€™sย still allowed, thoughย the independent Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety recommends limiting use to non-sensitizing levels.

Columbia University dermatologist Donald Belsito, who isย on the panel, told me thatย levels of the preservatives that remain in products here are unlikely to trigger contact allergies in people who donโ€™t already have them. But forย someone like me, who is already sensitized, even small amounts of MIย can trigger a rash, he said.

After the test result came in, my wife and I spentย hours scanning the ingredient lists ofย every liquid in our medicine cabinet, laundry room and under the kitchen sink. Isothiazolinones were everywhere:ย in the shampoo, in liquid soaps, inย dishwasher rinse aid, even our โ€œhypoallergenicโ€ laundry detergent. We got rid of all of them.

Itโ€™s still not clearย whether MIย was the main cause of my rash. I suffered from bad eczema as a child, and a recent biopsy was positive for eczema. So itย may have been a middle-aged eczema flareup that was merely exacerbated by theย preservatives. The good news: Between the allergen avoidance and a fancy new eczema drug I am taking, the rash is slowly subsiding.

If you suspectย you might have an MI allergyย and donโ€™t want to scanย labels, you can buy brand products from multinational companies that do business in Europe.ย Columbiaโ€™s Belsito says big international companies such as Unilever Plc or Procter & Gamble Co. donโ€™t like to reformulate productsย for each market, so their productsย may beย less likely to contain high levels of isothiazolinones. โ€”ย 

Enjoyed this article? Sign up for our newsletter to receive regular insights and stay connected.