Collaboration Requires Proximity – But It Doesn’t Have to Be Physical
For technology and transformation leaders, the practical question is not whether proximity matters, but how to manage it as a design variable. Hybrid collaboration should be treated as an operating-model choice, not an employee preference debate. That means defining which work genuinely benefits from co-location, which can be done asynchronously, and which needs deliberate network-building to work well across distance.
The management trade-off is clear: forcing office attendance may improve some interactions, but it also consumes time, increases coordination cost and can create compliance-without-collaboration if teams are present but not connected. Leaders should therefore set decision rights at team level, within guardrails from HR, IT and business management, rather than relying on one-size-fits-all mandates. The real issue is whether the organisation is creating the conditions for trust, speed and knowledge flow.
This also changes how success should be measured. Presence metrics are weak proxies for collaboration. Better questions are: Are cross-functional dependencies getting resolved faster? Are new joiners building networks quickly enough? Do distributed teams have the right rituals, shared tools and access patterns? Portfolio owners should fund the practices that support those outcomes: onboarding, mentoring, communities of practice, collaboration spaces and structured cross-team events.
For CIOs and transformation leaders, the next step is to test the model deliberately. Use pilots, compare team performance before and after changes, and ask where physical proximity truly adds value versus where social design can compensate. The strongest hybrid organisations will not maximize either office time or remote work; they will govern the balance with evidence, accountability and explicit management intent.
In our study, we took advantage of the relocation of a global pharmaceutical company’s regional offices to conduct a quasi-natural experiment. The offices, located in Singapore and Kuala Lumpur, were moved to new sites in the same cities. The new offices had an open-floor layout and hot desk policy where employees did not have assigned workspaces. We asked employees to identify their contacts at work, the nature of their relationships with those contacts and their work styles. We also collected data on the location of each employee’s desk before and after the relocation. We examined whether changes in physical distance and social networks before and after the move were associated with changes in collaboration effectiveness. Our findings revealed that both physical and social proximity were positively correlated with collaboration effectiveness. The value of closeness The value associated with physical proximity is perhaps not fully appreciated. Prior research has shown that being close to others makes working together easier by increasing the chances of reaching out to others. It also improves the amount and quality of communication which are needed to solve problems that arise during work. Beyond reaching out and communicating with others, simply being around other people fosters a sense of closeness and increases trust. It gives people more chances to get to know each other better, which in turn makes them work together better. In our study, we found that being physically close to colleagues leads to more frequent communication at work. However, the positive effect on collaboration is not just about frequent communication, which can also occur between physically distant co-workers, thanks to communication technologies. It’s also influenced by the positive feelings associated with physical proximity, such as familiarity, trust and relational energy – all of which contribute to more effective work relationships. Importance of social ties When it comes to social proximity, research shows that people who have strong social ties are naturally motivated to work well together. They are also willing to put in more time and effort to improve the quality of their communication and interaction. This positive effect of strong ties (frequent interactions between people who feel close to each other) is even stronger among people who have many contacts in common (known as “dyadic closure” among social network scholars). Common contacts provide a safe space for people to build trust, which is essential for good collaboration. Therefore, having mutual contacts positively impacts how well people work together.
Most surprisingly, we discovered that common contacts were as effective in promoting the development and strengthening of trust, reciprocation and cooperation for individuals who are physically distant as for those who are physically present. Our findings illustrate that physical proximity and social proximity can act as substitutes for each other, implying that individuals can still collaborate effectively even when they are not physically close, provided they have strong social ties and dyadic closure. Building bridges With the rise of remote and hybrid work arrangements, businesses are experimenting with new ways to organise their workspaces and teams. This can include assigning desks differently, allowing employees to work from home or other locations, or using a combination of these options. But these changes can affect how employees collaborate. To ensure effective collaboration, it’s crucial to consider both physical proximity and social networks when designing new setups. For instance, companies might create informal interaction areas like cafes and break rooms to encourage employees to build social networks at work.
Geographically dispersed organisations may need to be more intentional in facilitating social networking. Virtual water cooler chats and global collaboration days can bridge divides, while mentorship programmes can offer support for newcomers. Ultimately, we should not underestimate the potential of physical proximity. Going into the office only to remain locked to your workspace is a wasted opportunity. Organisations should actively organise informal gatherings such as lunches, social events and coffee chats to foster camaraderie, especially if remote working is a possibility later on. Successful collaboration in a hybrid world requires a multifaceted approach. It involves trying new ideas, leveraging technology and measuring the impact of our efforts. By encouraging both physical and social connections, we can create thriving work environments where location never becomes a barrier to teamwork and shared success.
Edited by:
Katy ScottAbout the author(s)
Manuel Sosa
Massimo Maoret
Enjoyed this article? Sign up for our newsletter to receive regular insights and stay connected.
