Top mistakes CIOs make when selecting team leaders
The central management issue is not whether a person is technically strong, but whether the role is designed to convert individual expertise into sustained team performance. CIOs often inherit a hidden assumption that promotion is a reward for technical excellence. That shortcut can create a fragile operating model: the best specialist becomes a manager who now has less time for deep work, more people decisions, and wider accountability.
The practical trade-off is speed versus durability. Promoting the obvious expert may feel low-risk in the short term, especially under delivery pressure. But it can weaken continuity if the new lead micromanages, absorbs too much work, or becomes the single point of failure for both technical decisions and people issues. CIOs should treat team-lead selection as a governance decision: define the outcomes expected from the role, then assess whether the candidate can delegate, develop others, and handle ambiguity.
A better decision process is to test leadership before formal promotion. Short-lived stretch assignments, acting-lead roles, and peer feedback can reveal whether someone can coordinate work, resolve friction, and use expert input without taking over. This matters because the evidence you need is behavioral, not just rรฉsumรฉ-based. The next question for CIOs is whether the organization has a repeatable model for identifying leadership potential, or whether each promotion is still an ad hoc judgment.
When a placement fails, the issue is not only the individualโit is the organizationโs response speed. Delayed correction increases team drift, weakens trust, and makes the eventual reversal more disruptive. Leaders should ask: who owns leadership selection, what signals trigger intervention, and how quickly can a misfit be moved back to an individual-contributor path without stigma?
Choose wisely
It’s important to select team leaders who have shown that they possess the ability, or at least the potential, to lead others, Kelley said. “These people need to be sufficiently technically competent so that others trust their technical proficiency, but they don’t have to be the top technical person.” Kelley said CIOs should choose individuals who have shown they can work well with others as a player/coach, can help develop team members’ skills and competencies, and have the ability to bring people together to tackle a difficult task. The CIO should also look for someone who will turn to technical experts when needed, and is willing to reach out across organizational boundaries to bring in outside resources and perspectives when needed. “Most important, they need to appreciate the fact that leadership requires a whole new set of competencies.”Damage control
Rely on team input and your own observations to determine if a failing team leader can be put on a correct course by providing proper training and mentoring, Kelley suggested. Have a heart-to-heart discussion with the incompetent team leader, he said. “Take ownership of the fact that you put them in a position where they aren’t succeeding.” Then ask the leader what caused things to go sideways, and share your perspective. “Ask if they would like to try to turn things around by developing a performance improvement plan, or if they would prefer to return to being a star individual contributor, where they have already excelled and can do so again.” Meanwhile, talk to the team members to get their view on what the team leader is doing wrong, Kelley said.” See if there are common threads,” he recommended. “Ask them what they would like to see happen and whether they think the team lead is salvageable.”Final thoughts
Speed matters. “Put the failing leader back where they shine, bring in a temporary experienced lead and get the team’s basic rhythms back on track,” Tkhir said. “It’s not about blaming anyone — it’s about preventing long-term damage and helping everyone get back into their zone.” Kelley agreed. “If you think that she or he can reintegrate back into the organization as an individual contributor, then do so,” he recommended. “If not, offer to help the individual find another position in the organization, or help them find a job with another employer.”Enjoyed this article? Sign up for our newsletter to receive regular insights and stay connected.
