Mehta’s “speed” agenda is only credible if it is governed as a portfolio, not celebrated as a series of quick wins. The article’s real management signal is that Goodyear is pairing experimentation with explicit sponsorship, kill switches and outcome measures. For CIOs, that is the difference between novelty theatre and scalable value. The practical question is not whether AI can be deployed faster, but which processes deserve accelerated decision rights because the cost of delay is higher than the risk of controlled failure.
The strongest implication is organizational, not technical. Moving from project IT to product IT changes accountability: business leaders must co-own metrics, funding and adoption, while technology teams become responsible for end-to-end performance rather than delivery milestones alone. That requires a cleaner operating model for prioritisation, since “lighthouse” initiatives can quietly compete for the same scarce data, plant, and domain experts. Leaders should ask whether there is a single portfolio forum that can arbitrate trade-offs across manufacturing, supply chain, finance and customer service.
His data emphasis also exposes a governance requirement that many AI programs underplay. If master data, ontology and knowledge graphs are the foundation of “enterprise grade intelligence,” then data ownership, stewardship and exception handling become executive responsibilities, not back-office tasks. A useful next question is which data products have formal service levels, who is accountable for corrections, and how quickly a bad model input is quarantined before it affects credit, inventory or production decisions.
Finally, the talent model matters as much as the technology. “Learning by evidence” is sensible, but only if it is tied to workforce planning, role redesign and manager incentives. Otherwise, AI-native specialists and domain experts will remain adjacent rather than integrated.
When Raman Mehta became chief information officer of The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company in December 2025, he joined an iconic manufacturer undergoing consequential change. The 128-year-old company generated $18.3 billion in 2025 sales and employs approximately 63,000 people across 48 manufacturing facilities in 19 countries. Its products serve consumer, commercial, aviation, farm, motorsports and recreational markets.
From Pilots to Lighthouse Projects
Mehta introduced that mindset through a simple message: “Momentum builds clarity.” Rather than wait for perfect data or a comprehensive multiyear design, he wants teams to deliver something consequential and learn from the result. His definition of speed is tied to measurable outcomes, not the number of experiments underway.Enterprise Grade Intelligence Starts With Clean Data
The largest constraint is the quality and structure of the enterprise data beneath the models. Many corporate systems were designed for an era in which rules produced a dashboard, a person interpreted the result and a workflow continued. AI can increasingly reason and act, but unreliable source data makes those capabilities dangerous in processes demanding precision.Product IT Changes the Role of Technologists
Mehta is moving the organization from project-based IT toward product IT. Technology leaders are expected to understand the business domain they serve, work with a business counterpart and identify the performance measures their product will influence. The approach draws on IT’s end-to-end understanding of processes such as order to cash and record to report. The shift requires a different talent model. As AI enables specification-based development and new forms of software engineering, measures such as lines of code are losing meaning. Instead of assigning generic courses, Goodyear emphasizes what Mehta calls learning by evidence. Employees develop skills on live projects, with AI-native practitioners working alongside colleagues who hold deep domain knowledge.Building the Connected Factory
Manufacturing is where Mehta’s data, product and AI agendas converge. Goodyear’s plants vary considerably in age, equipment and automation. The first requirement for a connected factory is therefore a governed backbone capable of collecting time-series data from machines, programmable logic controllers and production steps. On top of that layer, Mehta envisions manufacturing execution systems that understand the characteristics of a good tire, recognize deviations and trace problems through raw materials, machine tolerances and specifications. The longer-term goal is a closed loop in which the system recommends or takes corrective action within defined boundaries.Enjoyed this article? Sign up for our newsletter to receive regular insights and stay connected.

