Graph showing AI chip stocks falling and value stocks rising with investors moving towards value stocks

Memory Over Big Tech? Here’s Why Jefferies Prefers Micron, Samsung To Meta, Alphabet Amid ‘AI Fatigue’

For ETF investors, the key signal here is not a simple โ€œAI trade overโ€ message, but a possible rotation within the theme. When hyperscalers become crowded and expensive, capital can move toward the suppliers that sit higher up the AI spending chain: memory, storage, and other infrastructure names. That matters because many technology ETFs are built around market-cap weighting, which can leave them heavily exposed to the same few winners and the same valuation risk.

This is where index composition matters. A broad tech ETF may still own both the big cloud platforms and the semiconductor beneficiaries, but the portfolio outcome can differ sharply depending on whether the index is concentrated in mega-cap software and platforms or more evenly spread across chipmakers, equipment, and hardware. Investors using sector ETFs as a tactical tool should check whether the fund is actually capturing the โ€œpicks and shovelsโ€ layer, or simply repackaging the most familiar AI beneficiaries.

The second issue is financing discipline. The article highlights that AI capex is increasingly being funded not only from operating cash flow but, in some cases, from debt issuance. For long-term holders, that introduces a useful distinction between businesses that are spending to build the AI ecosystem and businesses that are selling the essential components. ETF investors should think about how much of their exposure depends on the marketโ€™s willingness to keep rewarding spending rather than monetisation.

Finally, this kind of rotation can test behaviour. Sector ETFs often look diversified, but performance can still be driven by a narrow set of names. Rebalancing rules, concentration limits, and the fundโ€™s definition of the sector all matter when sentiment shifts from AI enthusiasm to AI fatigue.


Tech investors are increasingly moving out of AI-linked semiconductor stocks due to an apparent ‘AI fatigue’ and finding opportunities to rotate intoย cheaper ‘value’ names which have not been part of the AI trade, global brokerage Jefferies pointed out in a note. Does it mean that the AI frenzy has come to an end once and for all? Well… not quite. Jefferies still believes that the AI capex race is far from over. Citing example of the KOSPI index, which has fallenย 22% from its June 19 peak, Jefferies classified such corrections asย both “natural and healthy”. However, the brokerage noted memory makers (such as Sandisk, Micron, SK Hynix) have outperformed hyperscalers with the likes of Amazon, Meta Platforms, Alphabet, and others. “The four hyperscalers have risen by 180% since the start of 2023, compared with a 760% gain for the three dominant memory makers, namely Micron, Hynix and Samsung Electronics,” Jefferies outlined. As long as the AI capex race continues, the beneficiaries will remain “the picks and shovels trade”; in other wordsย the people being paid for the capex not the companies spending the money According to the brokerage, this is something that traders have understood now. They are, therefore, betting harder on DRAM manufacturers.

The Earnings Test: Will Meta, Amazon, Alphabet & Microsoft Pass?ย 

Earnings, which begin on July 22, will put hyperscalers to the valuation test. These companies have already scaled their projected capex to a massive 92% of their projected operating cash flow during the last earnings season. Contrary to expectations, the projection proved to be a bullish catalyst for almost each of them. This is because investors perceiveย Alphabet, Microsoft and Amazon asย direct beneficiaries of AI capex spending via their cloud computing divisions. A lens which, unfortunately, bypassed Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta Platforms, according to Jefferies. Nonetheless, investors are growing wary of whether any of these companies will ever successfully monetise their AI capex. Jefferies flags a real possibility of none of them being able to do it.

Big Borrowing Bane?ย 

In addition to spending their cashflow, all these four companies, (with the exception of Microsoft Corp) are also increasingly borrowing money. The four major US hyperscalers have issued $169 billion worth of bonds so far this year, including $25 billion of Amazon bonds issued recently, compared with $83 billion in 2025, according to Bloomberg. “Alphabet, Amazon and Meta issued US$52bn, US$92bn and US$25bn year-to-date, while Microsoft has not yet issued any bonds. In addition, Oracle has also issued US$25bn of bonds year-to-date,” Jefferies highlighted.

What Does The Future Hold?ย 

Jefferies estimates AI capex by hyperscalers will total about $700 billion this year, exceed $800 billion next year, and surpass $1 trillion in 2027 when Oracle, OpenAI, Anthropic and neo-cloud providers are included. “The hyperscalers have underperformed the S&P 500 by 11% since early May and are down 8.7% from the peak reached in late May on a market capweighted basis,” Jefferies underlined. Going ahead the hyperscalers’ share price performance, both in absolute and relative terms, will remain crucial to monitor as massive selloff risks by traders grow on concerns surrounding lack of AI capex monetisation. Essential Business Intelligence, Sharp Market Insights, Practical Personal Finance Advice, Daily Fuel, Gold and Silver Prices and Latest Stories โ€” On NDTV Profit.
https://www.ndtvprofit.com/markets/memory-over-big-tech-heres-why-jefferies-prefers-micron-samsung-to-meta-alphabet-amazon-amid-ai-fatigue-11759157#publisher=newsstand

Enjoyed this article? Sign up for our newsletter to receive regular insights and stay connected.