From Classroom to Capital Markets: What CEOs and Policymakers Must Do for Young Investors

The Teen Investing Paradox: A striking tension is emerging in America’s next generation of investors. Teenagers increasingly want to start investing early—around age 19 on average—yet many admit they are nowhere near ready. This “intent–readiness gap” is not just a youth issue; it is a systemic risk for future household balance sheets, long-term capital formation, and social mobility.

In the CEOWORLD magazine study conducted with the CEO Policy Institute, 60 percent of American teens aged 15–19 say it is important for them to learn how to start investing. At the same time, 59 percent report feeling nervous, confused, or scared when they think about investing, revealing a deep emotional and educational disconnect behind the rhetoric of “early investing.”


Strong Interest, Weak Confidence

The data makes one thing clear: demand for investment knowledge among teens is high, but confidence is low. Six in ten teenagers explicitly prioritize learning how to invest, yet almost the same proportion associate investing with negative emotions. For CEOs and policy leaders, that is an early-warning signal that the next investor cohort is motivated, but fragile.

Self-assessed capability levels reinforce this story. Only 8 percent of teens consider themselves “experts,” while 39 percent place themselves at an intermediate level, 29 percent as novices, and 25 percent as complete beginners. In other words, nearly half of the teen population explicitly sits at the bottom of the investing knowledge curve—despite living in the most information-rich era in financial history.


Why Early Literacy Matters for Markets

The study rightly notes that this lack of confidence at the starting line makes targeted early education non-negotiable. When negative emotions—fear, confusion, anxiety—attach themselves to investing too early, they can compound into avoidance, short-termism, or speculative behavior later in life. By contrast, evidence from broader Gen Z research shows that those who are taught about investing earlier tend to be more confident and more likely to invest prudently.​

By embedding practical investing concepts before teens first fund a brokerage account, families, schools, and advisors can help ensure that when these young adults reach their preferred investing age, they understand not only potential returns but also risk, fees, time horizons, diversification, and the difference between trading and investing. This is not about pushing teenagers into markets, but about ensuring they are equipped to make informed choices when they decide to participate.


Advisors Want Financial Literacy to Be Mandatory

Financial advisors appear to be ahead of the policy curve. In a large survey of 15,200 advisors, an overwhelming 91 percent supported making financial literacy—explicitly including how to invest wisely—a high school graduation requirement. This near-consensus is significant: the professionals who see retail investor mistakes every day are calling for systemic, curriculum-level change.

Similar sentiment is visible in broader industry polling, where more than three-quarters of advisors in some markets support a national strategy to embed personal finance and investing education in secondary schools. For C-suite leaders in finance, asset management, and fintech, this represents both a risk and an opportunity: those who help close this gap can shape a more resilient investor base and build long-term trust with the next generation.​


When Do Young People Think Investing Should Start?

The study shows that both teens and young adults conceptually embrace early investing, even if their confidence lags. Among young adults aged 18–34, nearly half—49 percent—believe people should start investing between 18 and 24, with the average ideal starting age at 18 and almost 3 in 10 saying it should be even earlier.

Teenagers themselves are directionally aligned but slightly more conservative. A remarkable 83 percent say investing should begin between 18 and 24, with their average preferred starting age at 20. That gap—young adults targeting 18, teens targeting 20—suggests that real experience with income, bills, and debt in the early 20s may nudge perceptions toward starting sooner, not later.


How Much Money Do Teens Think They Need?

Perception of “minimum capital” is another practical barrier. One-third of surveyed advisors say less than 1,000 dollars is enough to begin investing, especially with the rise of fractional shares and low-cost index funds. Yet many teens still assume investing is only meaningful once they have saved several thousand dollars or more, which delays participation and the benefits of compounding.

Modern platforms, fractional investing tools, and no-minimum robo-advisors have radically reduced the financial threshold for entry. The real minimum today is less about dollars and more about literacy: a baseline understanding of risk, diversification, fees, and time horizon. That makes the case for integrating small, supervised “learning portfolios” into education rather than waiting until meaningful capital accumulates.​


What Young Adults Are Actually Investing For

Among young adults, the study identifies a pragmatic hierarchy of priorities:

  • 36 percent cite saving for retirement as a key investing goal.
  • 35 percent focus on buying a home or paying down a mortgage.
  • 34 percent prioritize building emergency savings.

This ranking is consistent with broader national surveys that show retirement security, home ownership, and financial resilience as core financial objectives for younger cohorts. The implication is that young Americans are not inherently speculative—they are trying to solve real, long-duration problems with limited tools and patchy education.​


The Risk of a “Soft Saving” Generation

At the same time, macro trends suggest a risk that this intent may erode if education and policy do not keep pace. Research on Gen Z documents a “soft saving” movement in which many young adults prioritize present quality of life over aggressive saving, often driven by high living costs, student debt, and skepticism about long-term stability. If this mindset is layered on top of low investing confidence, the result could be delayed participation in markets precisely when time is most valuable.​

Other studies show that many teens and young adults remain underprepared on basics such as interest rates, credit scores, and emergency savings, which further complicates their ability to invest confidently and responsibly. Without early scaffolding, they risk oscillating between paralysis and overconfidence—both damaging for long-term wealth building.​


What CEOs, Investors, and Policymakers Can Do

For business leaders, wealth managers, and policymakers, the implications are clear:

  • Champion mandatory financial education. Corporate leaders can publicly support state-level mandates and national standards that make personal finance and investing literacy a condition of graduation.​
  • Invest in scalable curricula and tools. Financial institutions can co-develop age-appropriate, digital-first programs that schools can deploy at low cost, aligning content with real-world investing decisions rather than abstract theory.​
  • Encourage supervised early investing. Partnering with families, advisors, and platforms to create “training wheels” accounts—small portfolios with clear rules—can help teens translate concepts into experience without catastrophic risk.

Done right, these interventions can convert today’s fear and confusion into informed caution and disciplined participation, strengthening both household balance sheets and long-term capital markets.


Why This Matters for Long-Term Capital Formation

A generation that wants to invest early but feels unprepared is both a vulnerability and an opportunity. If that gap remains unresolved, young Americans may underinvest, chase speculative fads, or enter markets too late to fully benefit from compounding. If it is closed, the country gains a more resilient, diversified base of long-term investors who understand risk, time, and purpose.

For CEOs, CFOs, asset managers, and policymakers, supporting teen investing literacy is no longer a corporate social responsibility side project. It is a strategic investment in the quality of tomorrow’s shareholder base, the stability of retirement systems, and the health of consumer demand that underpins the broader economy.

American teens, young adults, and investing

Metric / Insight Data Point / Description
Teens who say learning to invest is important 60% of American teens (15–19) believe it is important to learn how to start investing
Teens reporting negative emotions about investing 59% feel nervous, confused, or scared when thinking about investing
Teens self-identifying as beginners 25% identify as beginners in investing
Teens self-identifying as novices 29% call themselves novices
Teens self-identifying as intermediate 39% consider themselves intermediate
Teens self-identifying as experts 8% see themselves as experts
Advisors supporting mandatory high school financial literacy 91% of 15,200 advisors support financial literacy and investing education as a graduation requirement
Advisors sample size in CEOWORLD study 15,200 financial advisors surveyed
Advisors favoring small starting amounts About one-third say less than $1,000 is enough to begin investing
Teens’ preferred investing start window 83% say investing should begin between ages 18 and 24
Teens’ average preferred investing age Age 20
Young adults’ preferred investing start window (18–34) 49% say people should start investing between 18 and 24
Young adults’ ideal starting age Average ideal age is 18
Young adults wanting to start even earlier 29% think investing should begin before 18
Young adults prioritizing retirement as a goal 36% list saving for retirement as a main investing objective
Young adults prioritizing home purchase or mortgage 35% focus on buying a home or paying a mortgage
Young adults prioritizing emergency savings 34% emphasize building emergency savings
Gen Z average starting investing age (broader U.S. data) Around 19 years old on average
States requiring high school financial literacy (2025) 27 U.S. states mandate a personal finance course for graduation
Teens lacking basic personal finance preparedness High school juniors and seniors report feeling unprepared to manage personal finances, including investing
Teens worried about their financial future About 43% of teens report worry about covering future financial needs
Gen Z preference for quality of life over aggressive saving Around 73% of Gen Z prefer better quality of life to maximizing savings, shaping attitudes toward saving and investing
Younger adults with adequate emergency savings (3+ months expenses) Only 39% of Americans aged 18–29 have an emergency fund covering three months of expenses
Americans prioritizing emergency savings overall Around 64% say building emergency savings is a top financial priority
Gen Z investment access and confidence drivers Improved access to investing and early education cited as top reasons for higher confidence
Institutional push for school-based financial education National and state-level efforts increasingly require or promote financial literacy courses in high school curricula

From Classroom to Capital Markets: What CEOs and Policymakers Must Do for Young Investors

Enjoyed this article? Sign up for our newsletter to receive regular insights and stay connected.

Leave a Reply