What makes this study interesting is not that โpositivityโ alone changed immunity, but that a measurable brain signal tracked with a downstream biological response. That is a more cautious claim than popular headlines sometimes imply. The work suggests a connection between reward-related brain activity and vaccine antibody levels, but it does not show that anyone can simply think positively and reliably strengthen immune function in everyday life.
It also matters that the result is not the same as a treatment effect. Participants were trained inside a scanner with neurofeedback, a highly controlled setup that is very different from normal-life stress management or motivational thinking. The study therefore speaks more to mechanism than to practical self-help. Even if the brainโimmune link is real, it may depend on specific neural circuits, timing and context that are not yet understood.
Another point is the difference between correlation and causation. Higher activity in one brain region lined up with stronger antibody responses, but the broader training groups did not clearly outperform controls. That makes the findings intriguing yet incomplete. It is also important that antibody levels are a useful marker, but they are only one part of the immune response. The most responsible reading is that expectation and reward may interact with immunity, not that mindset replaces vaccination, medical care or established prevention.
On supporting science journalism
If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.Two other groups of participants were trained to activate different brain regions or received no training at all. All the participants then received the hepatitis B vaccine. Researchers measured their immune systemsโ response to the shot by checking the levels of hepatitis B antibodies in their blood two and four weeks later. People who showed higher activity levels in their VTA had higher levels of antibodies in their blood. This suggests that the body mounted a stronger immune response when the VTAโs reward pathways were activated. The study โis one of the first to show that activity in a specific human brain region can correlate with downstream antibody responses,โ says Isaac Chiu, an immunologist at Harvard University, who wasnโt involved in the research. That said, there werenโt significant differences in antibody levels between the group that got the neurofeedback training focused on reward regions of the brain and the groups that didnโt. This may be because the nucleus accumbens, the other reward region that some participants learned to ramp up, didnโt have the same connection to immune response, muddying the results. Participants who focused on positive expectations while in the brain scanner were more able to increase activity in the VTA, while concentrating on happiness or pleasure more broadly did not have the same effect. The result could indicate a potential connection with the placebo effect, a phenomenon whereby a sham intervention shows positive results in people who expect the treatment to benefit them. โThere has to be some kind of a biological mechanism that explains how, when we expect something positive to happen, actually something changes in our body,โ Lubianiker says. And while this study did not explicitly test the placebo effect, it does suggest our mind is connected to our immune system. โThis result showed the power of positivity. They utilized very modern and comprehensive methods, but the result is very simple,โ says Kyungdeok Kim of Washington University in St. Louis, who was not involved in the study but co-authored an accompanying article about the results. Researchers are still working to understand how the connection between the brainโs reward system and immune system works. Are brain signals transmitted to immune cells in the rest of the body via nerves, Chiu wonders, or some other mechanism? Itโs possible that the connection has deep evolutionary origins, hypothesizes Tamar Koren, a neuroimmunologist at Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and co-lead author of the study. Reward signals may have evolved to encourage us to seek out food and matingโboth of which can expose us to dangerous pathogens. It makes sense that, when we experience a feeling of reward, โwe will also boost our immune response towards something that is potentially harmful for us,โ she says.
Itโs Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, Iโd like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history. Iโve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too. If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized. In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can’t-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world’s best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription. There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope youโll support us in that mission.Enjoyed this article? Sign up for our newsletter to receive regular insights and stay connected.

