For technology leaders, the management question is no longer whether agentic AI can act, but who is accountable when it acts on imperfect data or in the wrong sequence. The article points to resilience architecture, but the real executive issue is control: defining decision rights, approval thresholds and escalation paths before autonomous tools become embedded in operations. That means treating agentic AI less like a productivity feature and more like an operational dependency with explicit ownership across IT, security, data and business teams.
The trade-off is speed versus assurance. A more integrated data fabric can improve detection and recovery, yet it also concentrates reliance on shared data quality, access controls and platform availability. CIOs and CTOs should ask which use cases genuinely need autonomy, which should remain advisory, and where human sign-off is mandatory. Not every workflow benefits from machine execution at scale; in some processes, slower but more reviewable automation will reduce enterprise risk and audit friction.
Programme leaders should also challenge how readiness will be measured. Traditional uptime and incident metrics are not enough if AI agents can create new failure modes through bad routing, misclassification or overconfident actions. Useful next questions include: What is the rollback plan for an agentic workflow? Which telemetry streams are authoritative? How will exceptions be tested under live conditions? What evidence will prove that resilience controls work across vendors, models and operating teams, not just in a pilot?
Machine data: A cornerstone of agentic AI and digital resilience
Earlier AI models relied heavily on human-generated data such as text, audio, and video, but agentic AI demands deep insight into an organizationโs machine data: the logs, metrics, and other telemetry generated by devices, servers, systems, and applications. To put agentic AI to use in driving digital resilience, it must have seamless, real-time access to this data flow. Without comprehensive integration of machine data, organizations risk limiting AI capabilities, missing critical anomalies, or introducing errors. As Kamal Hathi, senior vice president and general manager of Splunk, a Cisco company, emphasizes, agentic AI systems rely on machine data to understand context, simulate outcomes, and adapt continuously. This makes machine data oversight a cornerstone of digital resilience. โWe often describe machine data as the heartbeat of the modern enterprise,โ says Hathi. โAgentic AI systems are powered by this vital pulse, requiring real-time access to information. Itโs essential that these intelligent agents operate directly on the intricate flow of machine data and that AI itself is trained using the very same data stream.โ Few organizations are currently achieving the level of machine data integration required to fully enable agentic systems. This not only narrows the scope of possible use cases for agentic AI, but, worse, it can also result in data anomalies and errors in outputs or actions. Natural language processing (NLP) models designed prior to the development of generative pre-trained transformers (GPTs) were plagued by linguistic ambiguities, biases, and inconsistencies. Similar misfires could occur with agentic AI if organizations rush ahead without providing models with a foundational fluency in machine data. For many companies, keeping up with the dizzying pace at which AI is progressing has been a major challenge. โIn some ways, the speed of this innovation is starting to hurt us, because it creates risks weโre not ready for,โ says Hathi. โThe trouble is that with agentic AIโs evolution, relying on traditional LLMs trained on human text, audio, video, or print data doesnโt work when you need your system to be secure, resilient, and always available.โDesigning a data fabricย for resilience
To address these shortcomings and build digital resilience, technology leaders should pivot to what Hathi describes as a data fabric design, better suited to the demands of agentic AI. This involves weaving together fragmented assets from across security, IT, business operations, and the network to create an integrated architecture that connects disparate data sources, breaks down silos, and enables real-time analysis and risk management. โOnce you have a single view, you can do all these things that are autonomous and agentic,โ says Hathi. โYou have far fewer blind spots. Decision-making goes much faster. And the unknown is no longer a source of fear because you have a holistic system thatโs able to absorb these shocks and disruption without losing continuity,โ he adds. To create this unified system, data teams must first break down departmental silos in how data is shared, says Hathi. Then, they must implement a federated data architectureโa decentralized system where autonomous data sources work together as a single unit without physically mergingโto create a unified data source while maintaining governance and security. And finally, teams must upgrade data platforms to ensure this newly unified view is actionable for agentic AI. During this transition, teams may face technical limitations if they rely on traditional platforms modeled on structured dataโthat is, mostly quantitative information such as customer records or financial transactions that can be organized in a predefined format (often in tables) that is easy to query. Instead, companies need a platform that can also manage streams of unstructured data such as system logs, security events, and application traces, which lack uniformity and are often qualitative rather than quantitative. Analyzing, organizing, and extracting insights from these kinds of data requires more advanced methods enabled by AI.Harnessing AI as a collaborator
AI itself can be a powerful tool in creating the data fabric that enables AI systems. AI-powered tools can, for example, quickly identify relationships between disparate dataโboth structured and unstructuredโautomatically merging them into one source of truth. They can detect and correct errors and employ NLP to tag and categorize data to make it easier to find and use. Agentic AI systems can also be used to augment human capabilities in detecting and deciphering anomalies in an enterpriseโs unstructured data streams. These are often beyond human capacity to spot or interpret at speed, leading to missed threats or delays. But agentic AI systems, designed to perceive, reason, and act autonomously, can plug the gap, delivering higher levels of digital resilience to an enterprise. โDigital resilience is about more than withstanding disruptions,โ says Hathi. โItโs about evolving and growing over time. AI agents can work with massive amounts of data and continuously learn from humans who provide safety and oversight. This is a true self-optimizing system.โHumans in the loop
Despite its potential, agentic AI should be positioned as assistive intelligence. Without proper oversight, AI agents could introduce application failures or security risks. Clearly defined guardrails and maintaining humans in the loop is โkey to trustworthy and practical use of AI,โ Hathi says. โAI can enhance human decision-making, but ultimately, humans are in the driverโs seat.โ This content was produced by Insights, the custom content arm of MIT Technology Review. It was not written by MIT Technology Reviewโs editorial staff. It was researched, designed, and written by human writers, editors, analysts, and illustrators. This includes the writing of surveys and collection of data for surveys. AI tools that may have been used were limited to secondary production processes that passed thorough human review.Enjoyed this article? Sign up for our newsletter to receive regular insights and stay connected.

