How to Defy the Odds and Grow Value Through Acquisitions?

For technology leaders, the real acquisition question is not whether the deal closes, but which operating model survives day one. If the acquired business is meant to keep its brand, speed or customer intimacy, then IT cannot impose a single โ€œclean-upโ€ blueprint too early. The management task is to separate what must be standardised immediately โ€” identity, security, finance controls, reporting, service continuity โ€” from what should remain local until the value thesis is proven.

That makes decision rights more important than integration enthusiasm. CIOs and transformation leads should define who owns architecture, data, cyber, vendor contracts and change funding before diligence ends. Without that clarity, integration becomes a default IT project rather than a business choice. The practical trade-off is control versus autonomy: tighter central governance reduces risk and cost, but too much convergence can destroy the very differentiation the acquisition was meant to buy.

Acquisition value also depends on disciplined sequencing. Instead of a single โ€œintegration programme,โ€ leaders should build a staged value map with clear milestones: protect the revenue engine, stabilise core platforms, rationalise duplicate suppliers, then target process redesign or platform consolidation. That approach helps avoid overcommitting scarce internal talent while the business is still absorbing organisational change. It also forces the board to ask which benefits are timing-sensitive, which depend on data quality, and which may never justify the integration cost.

  • What must be harmonised in the first 90 days to reduce operational and compliance risk?
  • Which systems, vendors or teams should remain independent to preserve growth?
  • How will management measure value beyond cost synergies โ€” for example, service stability, time-to-integrate, or retained customers?

Analysing LVMHโ€™s long-time M&A strategy to avoid the usual pitfalls.
The dramatic bidding war between Paramount and Netflix for Warner Brothers Discovery reminds us that mergers and acquisitions (M&As) remain an ambitious CEOโ€™s favourite gambit. But executives are invariably shocked to learn that study after study show that 60-90 percent of M&As fail โ€“ whether thatโ€™s failure to achieve expected synergies or a complete failure that splits up the company a few years later. General Electric (GE), arguably the worldโ€™s most admired company back in 2000, has become a shadow of its former self after two decades of aggressive M&A-fuelled growth under CEO Jeff Immelt, the hand-picked successor to Jack Welch. GEโ€™s value plummeted 40 percent from US$400 billion in 2001 in US$240 billion in 2017, while the overall value of S&P 500 companies grew by 125 percent over the same period. GE continues to shed assets and was ultimately removed from the Dow Jones Industrial Average in 2018 after more than a century on that blue-chip index. One clear indication that most M&As fail to create value is that in 90 percent of the M&As involving a publicly listed buyer, the buyerโ€™s stock price falls upon announcement. Markets can be imperfect but this persistent signal tells us that more often than not, investors are unconvinced when executives talk about growth and โ€œsynergiesโ€ through an M&A. Growing through acquisitionsย  Paradoxically, no hyper-successful company has simply grown organically; they all have M&As in their back story. Walt Disney Company, Salesforce and Cisco Systems are all examples of firms that have flourished thanks to their strategic purchases. Another is LVMH, leader in the luxury industry and one of Europeโ€™s most valuable firms. LVMH currently controls 75 individual maisons, having made no fewer than 25 acquisitions over the past 25 years. The companyโ€™s market capitalisation has expanded 20 times (see chart); its turnover grew seven times from โ‚ฌ12.5 billion euros in 2004 to โ‚ฌ86 billion in 2023, while net profit leapt 12-fold from โ‚ฌ1.2 billion to โ‚ฌ15 billion. The luxury giant achieved what is often attributed to tech platforms โ€“ growing sales while expanding margins.
 
LVMHโ€™s dominance in the luxury industry is almost entirely driven by its M&As. But how did it do it? What does it do differently to defy the typically terrible odds of M&A success? Here are three lessons from the French conglomerate: 1. Reject synergyย  Executives almost always tout synergies when talking about M&As, be they cost savings (the โ€œsubtractionโ€ synergy), or revenue upside (the โ€œadditionโ€, or 1+1=3, synergy). LVMH never tries to achieve either form of synergy by combining different brands. Instead, the company ensures that each maison maintains its own identity, so much so that customers may never see the corporate ownership. For example, luxury-clad fashionistas need notโ€”and many do notโ€”know that Bulgari, Dior or Fendi are all owned by LVMH. What the Group does provide each maison, however, is an integrated backend covering logistics, technology and financial discipline. LVMH is a constellation: on the creative side, individuality is fiercely maintained; on the operations side, the corporation consolidates and streamlines business capabilities. This approach is similar to that of private equity firms such as Blackstone and holding companies such as Berkshire Hathaway. Stephen Schwarzman, founder and CEO of the Blackstone Group,ย  said that Blackstone buys IT services for all its portfolio companies and therefore can get prices that individual firms cannot. Warren Buffett, chair of Berkshire Hathaway, has stated that he lets his companies โ€œrun their own livesโ€ and that โ€œsynergy is a word used for acquisitions that otherwise donโ€™t make senseโ€. But behind the independence, there is a shared set of business practices and disciplines that make the collection worth more than the sum of parts. 2. Know what you want to buy and what you want to do with itย  In the small world of luxury, one always knows the brands that are โ€œin playโ€. Unlike private equity and traditional economy companies, however, valuation is high โ€“ luxury does not sell on the cheap. For an acquisition to be a success, there must be a clearly defined thesis of why you should own it. What does it bring to the group and vice versa? As the worldโ€™s largest luxury group, LVMH is constantly approached by intermediaries offering potential targets. But the group never buys a company that is being โ€œmarketedโ€ by an adviser. Its leaders make their own judgment about what to buy or not to buy. And when valuations are high, acquirers need the discipline of developing a comprehensive and detailed revenue enhancement plan prior to the acquisition in order to create value post-acquisition.ย  The interconnected โ€œsmall worldโ€ reality and high valuations for prime targets are factors that are in play in many industries beyond luxury. This lesson of โ€œknow your targetโ€ and โ€œknow yourselfโ€ aligns with another Stephen Schwarzman insight: 40-percent of whether a deal will make money (add value) or not is determined before the deal, and is based on the price. Understanding that reality should be the guide to whether you decide to buy it or not, and what your post-acquisition plans (at least roughly) are. 3. Focus on the long-termย 

This may not sound like a revolutionary concept, but when your stock fluctuates daily and when analysts and markets react to quarterly earnings reports, focusing on the long-term is not easy and takes courage. Instead of focusing on short-term return on investment, LVMH is willing to invest and even lose money, for up to five years. This ensures time to revamp marketing and restore the brand, in order to build lasting brand awareness and customer loyalty. A truism in finance is that it takes money to make money. For the luxury business, brand loyalty is the single most important intangible asset that gives a company a โ€œmoatโ€ โ€“ the ability to increase prices and not lose customers โ€“ and in LVMHโ€™s case, increase sales. But itโ€™s important to remember that building such brand loyalty โ€“ and the culture and heritage behind it โ€“ needs time. Applying the lessons These fundamental lessons from LVMHโ€™s approach to M&Asโ€”apply financial discipline, exercise judgment, and have a long-term focusโ€”are applicable to industries beyond luxury. Finally, one should never underestimate the role of luck. Mistakes and lucky breaks happen in the ebbs and flows of fashion and among the bulls and bears of the market. CEOs should be able to adjust to these fluctuations and remember that mistakes are often made in good times and bills come due in bad times.ย  In other words: maintain a long-term focus, and donโ€™t be swayed by the ever-changing tides.   This article is based on a fireside chat between Lily Fang and Jean-Jacques Guiony held at the INSEAD Asia Campus last year for the Singapore Business Federationโ€™s young leaders group and the European Chamber of Commerce.

Edited by:

Nick Measures

About the author(s)

Lily Fang
is the Dean of Research and Innovation, the UBS Chaired Professor in Investment Banking and a Professor of Finance at INSEAD. In addition, she directs the Finance for Executives course and the INSEAD Fintech Programme.
Jean-Jacques Guiony
is the President and Chief Executive Officer of the LVMH Group’s wines and spirits division, Moรซt Hennessy. Prior to this, he was the CFO of LVMH until 31 January 2025.
https://knowledge.insead.edu/leadership-organisations/how-defy-odds-and-grow-value-through-acquisitions

Enjoyed this article? Sign up for our newsletter to receive regular insights and stay connected.