Take a Fresh Approach to the ‘Agg’ With This Bond ETF
For bond investors, the real decision is not simply active versus passive. It is whether the portfolio needs a core holding that tracks a broad benchmark closely, or a manager-led approach that can deliberately tilt away from the benchmark’s biggest rate-sensitive exposures. That distinction matters because fixed income often serves as the stabilizer in a portfolio, so the fund’s construction should match the job it is meant to do.
MUSI’s structure introduces a different mix of interest-rate and credit risk than a plain aggregate fund. A larger allocation to corporate credit can improve income potential, but it also changes what drives results when markets turn. Investors comparing it with an aggregate ETF should look past the label and ask how the fund’s weighting across government, investment-grade and lower-rated bonds might behave if credit spreads widen or if Treasury yields move sharply.
Fees and implementation still matter, even in fixed income. Active bond ETFs can use flexibility in security selection and sector positioning, but that flexibility only helps if it is not overwhelmed by costs or by a portfolio that becomes too reliant on one market segment. For long-term allocators, the key question is whether the ETF offers a durable role alongside cash and shorter-duration holdings, rather than simply replacing one bond fund with another.
MUSI Could Boost Bond Returns
A problem some advisors and investors encounter with standard passive aggregate bond ETFs is that their return profiles are largely levered to Treasuries and agency-backed debt. That’s fine for risk-averse market participants and those that want exposure to the highest-quality debt, but that way of doing thing can weigh on long-term income and returns. “With yields ultralow for much of the past decade, bond returns have generally been meager. Through the end of December 2025, the Morningstar US Core Bond Index had logged an annualized return just shy of 2%,” added Benz. “While bond prices suffered painful declines as the Federal Reserve began to increase interest rates to combat inflation in 2022, those higher yields have translated into better returns for bond investors, as well as better downside protection.” MUSI has the potential to reward fixed income investors that are willing to accept slightly more risk. The bond ETF allocates a combined 44% of its weight to high-yield and investment-grade corporate debt — a high percentage relative to competing passive strategies. That’s not to say the ETF is “high risk.” It’s not. MUSI directs nearly 13% of its portfolio to U.S. government bonds and approximately 22% to debt rated AAA, AA or A. Home to 377 bonds, MUSI charges 0.38% per year, or $38 on a $10,000 investment.Enjoyed this article? Sign up for our newsletter to receive regular insights and stay connected.
